Capitalizing on Agricultural Potential in Rwanda: Strategies for Sustainable Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t3114Abstract
This paper examines gaps in agricultural knowledge transfer to smallholder farmers in Rwanda, focusing on the challenges and successes of agricultural development projects. Beginning with Rust et al.'s (2021) observations, which outlined many farmers' preference for learning from peers rather than traditional experts, the discussion focuses on how the trust deficit between farmers and agricultural researchers has harmed the effectiveness of development initiatives. Despite significant foreign investment in mechanization and large-scale agricultural projects like the Nasho and Kagitumba irrigation projects, the results have frequently been disappointing. This paper contrasts these large-scale efforts with successful models such as the European Union's DeSIRA program and the Sustainable Agriculture Community Partnership Program (SACPP), both of which have focused on participatory, locally adapted solutions that prioritize farmer involvement and respect for existing knowledge. The study demonstrates that, while Rwandan agriculture faces challenges, particularly in maize production, smallholder farms have enormous potential for increasing productivity through context-based innovations. The paper advocates for a shift from top-down, large-scale interventions to farmer-led processes that understand local conditions and foster long-term trust and respect. Successful models show that agricultural development in Rwanda can flourish by aligning strategies with farmers' realities and building trust through sustained, participatory engagement.
Keywords: Capitalizing, Agricultural Potential, Rwanda, Strategies, Sustainable Development
References
Bautze, D., Karanja, E., Musyoka, M., Rüegg, J., Goldmann, E., Kiboi, M., ... & Adamtey, N. (2024). Closing the crop yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems in Kenya: Long-term trial research indicates agronomic viability. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 18, 101499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101499
Mugabo, S., & Warner, J. (2024). Costs and returns in Rwandan smallholder agricultural production: Gross margins and profitability analyses. Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
Kalisa, V., & Aforabi, L. (2024). The Influence of Project Cost Control and Performance of Maize Project in Rwanda: A Case of Nasho Irrigation Project, Kirehe District. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 8(2,2023), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.59765/zytp8524hyr
Kalisa, V., & Aforabi, L. (2024). The influence of project Cost control and performance of Maize Project in Rwanda: A case of Nasho Irrigation Project, Kirehe District. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education. https://doi.org/10.59765/zytp8524hyr
Ngaruye, I., Nzabanita, J., Niragire, F., Rizinde, T., Nkurunziza, J., Ndikubwimana, J. B., Ruranga, C., Kabano, I., N. Muhoza, D., & Ahishakiye, J. (2023). Child stunting prevalence determination at sector level in Rwanda using small area estimation. BMC Nutrition, 9(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-023-00806-w
Rosset, P. (2000). The multiple functions and benefits of small farm agriculture in the context of global trade negotiations. Development, 43(2), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1110149
Rust, N. A., Stankovics, P., Jarvis, R. M., Morris-Trainor, Z., De Vries, J. R., Ingram, J., Mills, J., Glikman, J. A., Parkinson, J., Toth, Z., Hansda, R., McMorran, R., Glass, J., & Reed, M. S. (2021). Have farmers had enough of experts? Environmental Management, 69(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01546-y
Women farmers in Rwanda improve post-harvest handling. (2021, October 11). UN Women—Africa. https://africa.unwomen.org/en/news-and-events/stories/2021/10/feature-story--women-farmers-in-rwanda-improve-post-harvest-handling
