Effectiveness of Kenya's Anti-Corruption Frameworks in Public Procurement: A Case Study of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act of 2015

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of Kenya's anti-corruption frameworks in public procurement, with a specific focus on the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act (PPADA) of 2015. The PPADA was introduced as a legislative response to combat corruption in public procurement, a sector known for its vulnerability to fraudulent practices due to the large sums of public funds involved. This paper analyzes key provisions of the PPADA, its institutional framework, and its alignment with international best practices. Using a desktop review methodology, secondary data sources, including government reports, PPADA implementation records, and case studies of corruption in procurement, are examined. The study finds that while the PPADA has introduced significant reforms, such as mandatory competitive bidding, public disclosure of procurement activities, and the adoption of e-procurement, corruption remains a persistent issue. Institutional challenges, including inadequate training for procurement officers, insufficient resources, and political interference, continue to undermine the effectiveness of the Act. Despite these challenges, the PPADA has contributed to some positive changes, including increased transparency and public access to procurement information. However, the implementation of e-procurement and full compliance with the Act are still works in progress. The study concludes with recommendations for strengthening institutional coordination, enhancing the capacity of procurement officers, and expanding e-procurement to further curb corruption in Kenya's public procurement system.

Keywords: Public Procurement, Anti-Corruption, PPADA 2015, Transparency, E-Procurement, Kenya, Institutional Challenges, Public Policy.