Effect of E-Procurement Practices on Institutional Efficiency in Complying with Procurement Principles; A Case of Rwanda Polytechnic (2021-2023)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5367Abstract
The study examined the effect of e-procurement practices on institutional efficiency in adhering to procurement principles, with a specific focus on Rwanda Polytechnic from 2021 to 2023. grounded in transaction cost theory, resource-based view and institutional theory, the research provides a theoretical lens through which the relationship between e-procurement systems and organizational performance is explored. These theories collectively explain how e-procurement reduces transaction costs, leverages internal capabilities, and responds to institutional pressures for improved governance. The study pursued several objectives: to assess the extent to which e-tendering influences institutional efficiency in complying with procurement principles; to evaluate the effect of e-evaluation processes on procurement compliance; and to determine the impact of e-contract management on institutional efficiency. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving a structured questionnaire administered to 128 respondents selected through stratified purposive sampling from a target population of 188 procurement staff. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including correlation and regression analysis, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis to enrich and validate the findings. Findings revealed that e-tendering significantly enhances transparency and competition, as evidenced by an average respondent score of 4.3 on a 5-point Likert scale. E-evaluation promotes accountability and fairness by minimizing human bias through automated processes, with regression analysis showing a strong positive coefficient (β = 0.78). Additionally, e-contract management was found to streamline operations, reduce contract-related risks, and boost compliance with procurement regulations, with 87% of respondents affirming its effectiveness in improving accountability. Overall, the study established a strong positive correlation (r = 0.82) between e-procurement practices and institutional efficiency in compliance with procurement principles. The study recommends increased investment in capacity building through staff training, continuous system upgrades to address technological challenges, and regular policy reviews to align e-procurement practices with international standards. The findings underscore the strategic value of e-procurement in enhancing efficiency, transparency, and accountability within public sector procurement.
Keywords: E-procurement practices, institutional efficiency, procurement principles, Rwanda Polytechnic
References
Abushaikha, I. (2014). Supply chain integration from a resource-based view perspective: empirical evidence from Jordan's garment manufacturers international supply chains (Doctoral dissertation, Heriot-Watt University).
Adebayo, A., & Yusuf, T. (2019). E-contracting and transparency in public procurement: An empirical analysis. Journal of Procurement and Contract Management, 7(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCM-2019-0158
Ameyaw, C., & Mensah, S. (2019). Impact of e-tendering on procurement practices in public institutions. Journal of Procurement Management, 12(2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1504/JPM.2019.011420
Asima, Y.S. & Februati, T. (2014). E-Procurement Policy Model: Striving towards Transparency in Goods and Services Procurement in North Sumatera Indonesia, Public Policy and Administration Research, 4(12) 2014.
Baily, P., Farmer, D., Crocker, B., Jessop, D., & Jones, D. (2015). Procurement Principles and Management. Pearson Education.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Basheka, B., Oluka, P. & Mugurusi, G. (2012) ‘Adopting new approaches for public procurement efficiency: critical success factors (CSFs) for the implementation of e-procurement in Uganda’s public sector’, International Journal of Procurement Management, 5(6), 712–732.
Bigsten, A. (2013). Fiscal capacity and the quality of government in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 45, 92-107.
Carayannis, E. G., & Popescu, D. (2005). Profiling a methodology for economic growth and convergence: Learning from the EU e-procurement experience for central and eastern European countries. Technovation, 25(1), 1-14.
Cengiz, E., & Kayalar, Y. (2019). Predictive Analytics in Supply Chain Management: A Practical Approach. Springer.
Choi, J., & Chandler, D. (2021). The impact of e-evaluation on procurement fairness and competition: Insights from public institutions. Journal of Public Procurement, 21(3), 212-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-2020-0456
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation (6th ed.). Pearson.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Croom, S., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2007). Impact of e-procurement: Experiences from implementation in the UK public sector. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(4), 294-303.
Darin, M. (2010). Strategic procurement in the public sector: a mask for financial and administrative policy. Journal of public procurement, 5(3), 388-399. Doi: 1120k/s.1005j
Davila, A., Gupta, M., & Palmer, R. (2003). Moving procurement systems to the internet: The adoption and use of e-procurement technology models. European Management Journal, 21(1), 11-23.
De Vries, B., Mlecnik, E., Fantke, P., & Friedrich, R. (2018). Integrating Human Health into Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Review of Current Methodologies. Science of The Total Environment, 627, 246–259.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Eadie, R., Perera, S., & Heaney, G. (2010). A cross-discipline comparison of rankings for e-procurement drivers and barriers within UK construction organisations. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 15, 217-233.
Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors. John Wiley & Sons. e-procurement on supply chain performance. Business Process Management Journal,
Garrido-Samaniego, M. J., Gutiérrez-Arranz, A. M., & San José Cabezudo, R. (2010). Assessing the impact of e-procurement on the structure of the buying centre. International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 135-143.
Gelderman, C. J., Ghijsen, P. W. T., & Brugman, M. J. (2016). Public procurement and EU tendering directives–explaining non-compliance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(7), 702-714.
Gupta, M., & Narain, R. (2015). A fuzzy ANP based approach in the selection of the best e-Business strategy and to assess the impact of E-Procurement on organizational performance. Information Technology and Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, 339-349.
Handfield, R. B., & Cousins, P. D. (2011). Supply Chain Management: A Global Perspective (2nd ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
Harelimana, J.B. (2018). The Impact of E-Procurement on the Performance of Public Institutions in Rwanda. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: Accounting and Auditing (18) 2, 21-31
Jones, R., & Taylor, M. (2020). Conceptual review of theories and frameworks in organizational behavior. Journal of Management Studies, 57(3), 412-430.
Karrass, C. (2007). In Business as in Life, You Don't Get What You Deserve, You Get What You Negotiate. Crown Business.
Kim, J. I., & Hunk, D. L. (2004). Matching indirect procurement process with different B2B e- procurement systems. Computers in Industry, 53(2), 153–164.
Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2019). E-evaluation and its influence on efficiency and accountability in procurement: A comparative study. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 456-470. https://doi.org/10.20510/IJSCM.2019.080245
Kumar, S., & Ahuja, S. (2020). E-contracting: The emerging role in modern procurement practices. Journal of Public Procurement, 20(4), 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-01-2020-0005
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2016). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm (14th ed.). Pearson.
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2010). Negotiation (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Lunch, J., (2016). Public and Project Procurement for biginners and aspiring procurement practitioners, available at http://www.procurementclassroom.com
Mensah, C., & Ameyaw, S. (2020). Enhancing procurement transparency through e-evaluation: Evidence from Ghanaian public institutions. African Journal of Business and Management, 15(4), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajbm.v15i4.3
Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. Cengage Learning.
Mukasa, D., & Ntayi, J. (2020). E-tendering and procurement transparency in developing countries: A case study of Uganda. African Journal of Business Ethics, 14(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajobe.v14i1.6
Muthoni, J., & Rukunga, S. (2021). The impact of e-procurement on organizational performance: A case of public institutions in Kenya. International Journal of Procurement Management, 14(3), 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2021.114249
Office of Auditor General (2020). 2018/2019 financial report of Office of Auditor General, on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. Journal of operation in the UK Public Sector. Journal of Public Procurement, 5(3), 367–387. Operations Management, 29(1–2), 368–388.
Raiffa, H. (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press.
Rainer, R. K., Prince, B., & Cegielski, C. (2014). Introduction to Information Systems: Supporting and Transforming Business (5th ed.). Wiley.
Shalle, N. and Irayo, M. (2013). Factors Affecting Implementation of E-Procurement Practices in Public Service. International Journal of Science and Research, 2(8), 307-320. Doi: 12.1110/k.1523.2013
Smith, R., & Johnson, L. (2021). E-contracting and its impact on economic efficiency and accountability in procurement. International Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Management, 10(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.20510/IJSCOM.2021.100105
Tashobya, 2015, “New law to streamline public procurement” The newtimes, viewed 10 November, 2024.
The procurement classroom, “Public and Project Procurement for Beginners and Aspiring Procurement Practitioners”, available at http://www.procurementclassroom.com, accessed on 16/02/2016.
Tipalti. (2023). e Tendering Definition: What is e Tendering? Retrieved from Tipalti
Uddin, M., 2015. Prospects and challenges of e-procurement in government purchases: a study on e-procurement in LGED, Narayanganj District (Doctoral dissertation, BRAC University).
Vaidya, K., Sajeev, A. S. M., & Callender, G. (2006). Critical factors that influence e-procurement implementation success in the public sector. Journal of Public Procurement, 6(1), 70-99.
Wang, Y., & Zhuang, S. (2021). The impact of e-contracting on procurement efficiency and compliance. International Journal of Procurement Management, 14(4), 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2021.115355
World Bank (2016), improving public sector performance through innovation and inter-agency coordination. Case study, Rwanda: Pioneering e-Procurement in Africa.
