Effect of Traditional Knowledge System in Sustainable Development and Management of Natural Resources in Meru Community

Authors

  • Stephen Mbae Muthamia Tangaza University College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5036

Abstract

This paper aimed at studying the effect of traditional knowledge system in sustainable development and management of natural resources in Meru community.  The study was guided by the following questions: What is the role of indigenous system in the protection and conservation of natural resources in Meru community? What is the role of integrated environmental management frame work in the sustainable development and management of natural resources in Meru community? What is the relationship between participatory decision making, policy maker’s implementation and natural resources users in Meru community? The research was conducted in Meru and Tharaka Nithi Counties and through purposeful sampling had two case studies from each county in Meru community. Data was collected using guided interviews and semi structured questions. The data was collected through a focus group discussion, documents and audio-visual materials. The study reviewed the literature to understand the effect of traditional knowledge system in sustainable development and management of natural resources in Meru community. Theoretical insights and empirical findings from the studies suggest that despite the generalized worldwide trend of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) erosion, substantial pockets of TEK persist in both developing and developed countries. The findings also reinforce previous hypotheses pointing at the importance of TEK systems as reservoirs of experiential knowledge that can provide important insights for the design of adaptation and mitigation strategies to cope with global environmental change in the management of natural resources. Recognition of endogenous management of Indigenous knowledge becomes an enhancing solution to the seemingly mega challenges of community development. Indigenous knowledge is a more secure foundation for sustainable solutions to challenges in developmental issues in communities and in Africa. Advanced technology in Indigenous knowledge (IK) usage and preservation empowers users to improve on pre-existing solutions to a problem, achieve a goal, and most of all improve on the standards of living.

Keywords: Traditional knowledge System, development and management, Natural Resources, Meru community

Author Biography

Stephen Mbae Muthamia, Tangaza University College

PhD Researcher, Tangaza University College: Kenya

References

Adam, A. (2012). Recognising sacred natural sites and territories in Kenya: An analysis of how the Kenyan constitution, national and international laws can support the recognition of sacred natural sites and their community governance systems. Available at https://cmsdata. iucn.org/downloads/gaiasns_1.pdf [Accessed 20 April 2021]

African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO), Swakopmund Protocol on the Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Expressions of Folklore, Adopted by the Diplomatic Conference of ARIPO at Swakopmund (Namibia) on August 9, 2021.

Berkes, F. (2004). Traditional Ecological Knowledge in perspective. Pages 1-6 in J.T. Inglis editor. Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Concepts and Cases. International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Ottawa, Canada. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315114644-1

Briggs J (2005) The use of indigenous knowledge in development: problems and challenges. Prog Dev Stud 5:99–114. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993405ps105oa

Catton, W. R. (1987). The World’s most Polymorhic Species. Bioscience 37(6), 413-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/1310565

Chambers, R. (1983). Rural Development: Putting the Last First. London: Longmans.

Christensen (2014). Australia: Heading back to homelands. Available at http://www.christensenfund.org/2014/04/08/australia-homelandsmovement/ [Accessed 8 April 2021].

Claridge T. (2004) Designing Social Capital Sensitive Participation Methodologies

Conway (1997). Food for all in the twenty-first century.

Ellis, S.C. (2005). Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making," Arctic 66-77.

Fadiman, J. (1993). Early History of Meru of Mt. Kenya. Journal of African History, 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853700012147

Freire, P. (, 2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: The Continuum Publishing Company

Gadgil, M, Shhegiri Rao, P.R., Utkarsh, G., Promod, P., & Chhatre, A., (2000). Members of the People’s Biodiversity Initiative. New Meaning for Old

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

GOK (2004 & 2005) Departments Annual Plans – Meru North District.

Goldman, M., (2007). Tracking wildebeest, locating knowledge: Maasai and conservation biology understandings of wildebeest behavior in Northern Tanzania. Environment and Planning D: Society and space 25, no. 2 307-331. https://doi.org/10.1068/d0505

Huntington, H. P. (2000). Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecological Applications 10(5): 1270–1274. Available at http://www.fws.gov/nativeamerican/pdf/tekhuntington-2000.pdf [Accessed 15 April, 2021]. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1270:UTEKIS]2.0.CO;2

Kothari, A., (2006). Community Conserved Areaa, In Managing Protected Areas: A global guide.

Maathai, W. (2007). Unbowed: One woman’s story a memoir. Random House Inc, New York.

Mohammad, N., (2014). Environmental Rights for Administering Clean and Healthy Environment towards Sustainable Development in Malaysia: A Case Study,’ International Journal of Business and Management; Vol. 9, No. 8; pp. 191-198. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n8p191

Muchui, D. (2013a). Njuri Ncheke to set up Multimillion culture centre. September 13. Available on:https://ciameru.wordpress.com/2013/09/16/njuri-ncheke-to-set-up

Muigua, K., (2016). Nurturing Our Environment for Sustainable Development, Glenwood Publishers, Nairobi,

Muigua, K., (2017). Harnessing Traditional Knowledge for Environmental Conflict Management.. Nairobi: Longman.

Odera, J. (2004). Lessons Learnt on Community Forest Management in Africa. Report for project ‘Lessons Learnt on Sustainable Forest Management in Africa’. National Museums of Kenya in conjunction with KSLA/AFORNET/FAO.

Sheehan, N. (2011). Indigenous Knowledge and Respectful design. An evidence-based approach. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00106

Stem et al (2002) Community Participation in Eco-tourism Benefits; the Link to Conservation Practices and Perspectives.

Thomas, L. M. (2003). Politics of the womb: women, reproduction, and the state in Kenya. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520936645

UNEP (2006). Our Environment Our Wealth. Division of Early Working and Assessment (DEWA)

UNEP (2008) Indigenous Knowledge in Disaster Management in Africa United Nations Environment Program, Nairobi, Kenya.

United Nations Forum on Forums Secretariat (2011): UNFF9: ‘Forests for People, livelihoods and poverty eradication’ Community Forest Management

Usher, P.J., (2000). Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management. Arctic, 53, no. 2 183-193. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic849

Warren D.M, (1991). Using indigenous knowledge in agricultural development, World Bank Discussion Paper, No. 127, The World Bank, Washington.

Whyte, K.P., (2013). On the role of traditional ecological knowledge as a collaborative concept: a philosophical study." Ecological processes, Vol.2, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1709-2-7

World Bank (1998). Indigenous knowledge for development. A framework for development. Knowledge and learning centre, Africa Region.

World Bank, (1996). Notes for the Kenya Forestry Development Project Mid-Term Review’, World Bank, Washington DC

Downloads

Published

2021-12-08

How to Cite

Muthamia, S. M. (2021). Effect of Traditional Knowledge System in Sustainable Development and Management of Natural Resources in Meru Community. Journal of Public Policy & Governance, 5(3), 112–136. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5036

Issue

Section

Articles