Decentralization in Public Policy and Governance of Public Services in Alaska, USA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5165Abstract
Public policy is developed through a process of policy analysis, debate, and decision-making, involving various stakeholders such as government officials, civil society organizations, and citizens. . Effective decentralization requires careful planning, institutional design, and monitoring and evaluation to ensure that it promotes good governance and produces positive outcomes for citizens. Effective governance structures and processes are necessary to develop and implement effective public policies, while well-designed public policies can help to promote good governance by fostering transparency, accountability, and participation. The research used the descriptive research design. The target population was 40 public officers in Alaska, USA. Questionnaires were utilized to gather the data. The study found that decentralization in the public policy and governance of public services in Alaska, USA have significant effects on the efficiency, effectiveness, and responsiveness of the system. By transferring decision-making authority and responsibilities from central government entities to local or regional authorities, decentralization allows for increased local autonomy and tailored decision-making. Local authorities, such as municipalities or regional governments, have a better understanding of the specific needs and priorities of their communities. The study concluded that decentralization in public policy and governance of public services in Alaska has the potential to enhance local responsiveness, citizen engagement, and overall effectiveness of public service delivery, while also necessitating careful attention to address potential challenges and ensure equitable outcomes. The study recommended that effective implementation of decentralization in the public policy and governance of public services requires strengthening governance structures, capacity building, fostering citizen participation, ensuring equitable resource allocation, and continuous monitoring and evaluation. Decentralization requires solid institutional capacity at all levels of government to ensure that policies are effectively implemented and resources are efficiently utilized. Monitoring and evaluation are critical to assessing the effectiveness of decentralization efforts and identifying areas for improvement
Keywords: Decentralization, public policy, governance, public services, USA
References
Brisbois, M. C. (2020). Decentralised energy, decentralised accountability? Lessons on how to govern decentralised electricity transitions from multi-level natural resource governance. Global Transitions, 2, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.01.001
Cashore, B., Knudsen, J. S., Moon, J., & van der Ven, H. (2021). Private authority and public policy interactions in global context: Governance spheres for problem solving. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1166-1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12395
Faguet, J. P., & Shami, M. (2022). The incoherence of institutional reform: Decentralization as a structural solution to immediate political needs. Studies in Comparative International Development, 57(1), 85-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09347-4
Fatoni, A. (2020). Fiscal Decentralization Dilemma in Indonesia: Between Corruption Accountability and Probability at Local Levels. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 12(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.101-110
Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, communication & society, 22(6), 854-871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914
Hao, Y., Gai, Z., Yan, G., Wu, H., & Irfan, M. (2021). The spatial spillover effect and nonlinear relationship analysis between environmental decentralization, government corruption and air pollution: Evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 763, 144183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144183
Haydanka, Y. (2020). Urgent Decentralization Problems in the Czech Republic at a Regional Level: Political, Administrative and Sociological Dimensions. Viešoji politika ir administravimas, 19(2), 253-265.
Hsieh, K., Phanishayee, A., Mutlu, O., & Gibbons, P. (2020, November). The non-iid data quagmire of decentralized machine learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 4387-4398). PMLR.
Jiang, K., You, D., Merrill, R., & Li, Z. (2019). Implementation of a multi-agent environmental regulation strategy under Chinese fiscal decentralization: An evolutionary game theoretical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 902-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.252
Levaggi, L., Levaggi, R., Marchiori, C., & Trecroci, C. (2020). Waste-to-Energy in the EU: The effects of plant ownership, waste mobility, and decentralization on environmental outcomes and welfare. Sustainability, 12(14), 5743. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145743
Massoud, M. A., Mokbel, M., Alawieh, S., & Yassin, N. (2019). Towards improved governance for sustainable solid waste management in Lebanon: Centralised vs decentralised approaches. Waste Management & Research, 37(7), 686-697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X19836705
Mikalef, P., Pateli, A., & van de Wetering, R. (2021). IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 512-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1808541
Nogueira, F. (2023). European Urban Agenda: The Predicaments of Decentralised Coordinative Action. In Territorial Innovation in Less Developed Regions: Governance, Technologies, and Sustainability (pp. 215-243). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20577-4_11
Perrin, C., Nougarèdes, B., Sini, L., Branduini, P., & Salvati, L. (2018). Governance changes in peri-urban farmland protection following decentralisation: A comparison between Montpellier (France) and Rome (Italy). Land Use Policy, 70, 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.027
Rohdewohld, R. (2022). Decentralization, Local Governance, and Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals in Cambodia. In Decentralization, Local Governance, and Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals in Asia and the Pacific (pp. 225-252). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003282297-13
Sabir, B. Y., Jabbar Othman, B., Gardi, B., Burhan Ismael, N., Abdalla Hamza, P., Sorguli, S., ... & Anwar, G. (2021). Administrative Decentralization: The Transfer of Competency from The Ministry of Education to General Directorates. International Journal of Rural Development, Environment and Health Research (IJREH), 5. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijreh.5.3.1
Trusova, N. V., Kohut, I. A., Osypenko, S. A., Radchenko, N. G., & Rubtsova, N. N. (2019). Implementation of the results of fiscal decentralization of Estonia and the countries of the European Union. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 10(6 (44)), 1649-1663.
Valle-Cruz, D., Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. A. (2020). Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence: From agenda-setting to policy evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101509
Wu, H., Li, Y., Hao, Y., Ren, S., & Zhang, P. (2020). Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: Evidence from China. Science of the total environment, 708, 135085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135085
Zerbian, T., & de Luis Romero, E. (2021). The role of cities in good governance for food security: lessons from Madrid’s urban food strategy. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.1873174
Zhang, J., Qu, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Miao, X. (2019). Effects of FDI on the efficiency of government expenditure on environmental protection under fiscal decentralization: A spatial econometric analysis for China. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(14), 2496. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142496
