Utilization of Learning Management Systems: Perspective of Physically Challenged Learners in Africa
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to examine the Utilization of Learning Management Systems: Perspective of Physically Challenged Learners in Africa. The study was guided by three objectives which were; to establish the factors influencing the utilization of learning management systems by physically challenged learners in Africa, to determine the barriers hindering utilization of learning management systems by physically challenged learners in Africa and to provide Policy Recommendations based on the findings. The study was informed by the Diffusion of Innovation Theory and the Change Theory. Learning disabilities (LD) vary from person to person. One person with learning disabilities may not have the same as another is having, one person may have trouble with reading and writing, however, another may have the problem of understanding a concept and the other may have the problem of understanding what others are telling them. The most obvious benefit of Learning Management Systems (LMS) utilization for the physically challenged students is that they stay in their comfort zone without rushing to a campus or commuting between classes to classes. The paper used a desk study review methodology where relevant empirical literature was reviewed to identify main themes. The study findings revealed that, acknowledging accessibility in e-Learning is a key issue vouching to promote and ensure e-inclusion of students with disabilities. The study recommended that, studies evaluating utilization of LMS should employ a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches such that each can compensate for the weakness of the other, thereby giving a detailed and credible result.
Key Words: LMS, Physically Challenged Learners, Utilization
References
Alamri, A., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2017). Factors Affecting Learners with Disabilities–Instructor Interaction in Online Learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 59-69.
Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). The effect of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) application on e-learning acceptance: A structural equation model. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6).
Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29-42.
Bell, D., & Swart, E. (2018). Learning experiences of students who are hard of hearing in higher education: Case study of a South African university. Social Inclusion, 6(4), 137-148.
Casany, M. J., Alier, M., Mayol, E., Piguillem, J., Galanis, N., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Conde, M. Á. (2012). Moodbile: A framework to integrate m-learning applications with the LMS. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 44(2), 129.
Cinquin, P. A., Guitton, P., & Sauzéon, H. (2019). Online e-learning and cognitive disabilities: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 130, 152-167.
Cooper, M., Ferguson, R., & Wolff, A. (2016, April). What can analytics contribute to accessibility in e-learning systems and to disabled students' learning?. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge(pp. 99-103). ACM.
Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2011). Disability and new media. Routledge.
Fichten, C. S., Ferraro, V., Asuncion, J. V., Chwojka, C., Barile, M., Nguyen, M. N., ... & Wolforth, J. (2013). Disabilities and e-learning problems and solutions: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 241-256.
Fisseler, B., & Bühler, C. (2017, September). Accessible e-learning and educational technology extending learning opportunities for people with disabilities. In Proceedings of the International Conference of “Interactive computer aided learning” ICL2007: EPortofolio and Quality in e-Learning (pp. 26-28).
Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2018). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. Guilford Publications.
Fox, S. (2011). Americans living with disability and their technology profile. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project.
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. Routledge.
Gutenbrunner, C., Tederko, P., Grabljevec, K., & Nugraha, B. (2018). Responding to the World Health Organization Global Disability Action Plan in Ukraine: developing a national disability, health and rehabilitation plan. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 50(4), 338- 341.
Hawkridge, D., Vincent, T., & Hales, G. (2018). New information technology in the education of disabled children and adults. Routledge.
Jaeger, P. T. (2015). Disability, human rights, and social justice: The ongoing struggle for online accessibility and equality. First Monday, 20(9).
Jemni, M., Laabidi, M., & Ayed, L. J. B. (2014). Accessible E-learning for Students with Disabilities: From the Design to the Implementation. In The New Development of Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 53-74). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Jordan, K., & Tseris, E. (2018). Locating, understanding and celebrating disability: Revisiting Erikson’s “stages”. Feminism & Psychology, 28(3), 427-444.
Kent, M. (2015). Disability and eLearning: Opportunities and barriers. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(1).
Kent, M. (2016). 14 Opportunities for eLearning, social media and disability. Disability and Social Media: Global Perspectives, 191.
Kent, M., Ellis, K., Pitman, T., McRae, L., & Latter, N. (2019). 3 Disability, higher education and e-learning. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Disability: Looking Towards the Future, 2.
Kent, M., Ellis, K., Pitman, T., McRae, L., & Latter, N. (2019). 3 Disability, higher education and e-learning. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Disability: Looking Towards the Future, 2.
Kumar, K. R. A., Ravi, S., & Srivatsa, S. K. (2011). Effective e-learning approach for Students with Learning Disabilities. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 2(11), 1.
Laabidi, M., Jemni, M., Ayed, L. J. B., Brahim, H. B., & Jemaa, A. B. (2014). Learning technologies for people with disabilities. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 29-45.
Lebenicnik, M., & Starcic, A. I. (2018, August). Factors Related to the Use of Online Learning Resources: The Perception of Environmental and Contextual Barriers of Students with Special Educational Needs and Their Peers. In International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning (pp. 329-336). Springer, Cham.
Maboe, M. J., Eloff, M., Schoeman, M., & Kayode, O. (2018, July). The Experience of Students with Disabilities at an Open Distance e-Learning Institution. In ICEL 2018 13th International Conference on e-Learning (p. 220). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
Meskhi, B., Ponomareva, S., & Ugnich, E. (2019). E-learning in higher inclusive education: needs, opportunities and limitations. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(3), 424-437.
Mullinix, B., & McCurry, D. (2013). Balancing the learning equation: Exploring effective mixtures of technology, teaching and learning. The Technology Source.
Rogers, C. R. (1995). A way of being. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Sadao, K. C., & Robinson, N. B. (2010). Assistive Technology for Young Children: Creating Inclusive Learning Environments. Brookes Publishing Company. PO Box 10624, Baltimore, MD 21285.
Tom, S. L., Mpekoa, N., & Swart, J. (2018, March). Factors that affect the provision of visually impaired learners in higher education. In 2018 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Wentz, B., Jaeger, P. T., & Lazar, J. (2011). Retrofitting accessibility: The legal inequality of after-the-fact online access for persons with disabilities in the United States. First Monday, 16(11).
World Health Organization. (2018). World health statistics 2018: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals.
